WHO informal consultation on revision of guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products, virtual meeting, 30 June - 2 July 2021.

The WHO informal consultation was held to promote the revision of WHO guidelines on evaluation of similar biotherapeutic products (SBPs) adopted by the Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) in 2009. It was agreed in the past consultations that the evaluation principles in the guidelines are still valid, but a review was recommended to provide more clarity and case-by-case flexibility. The opportunity was therefore taken to review the experience and identify areas where the current guidance could be more permissive without compromising its basic principles, and where additional explanation could be provided regarding the possibility of reducing the amount of data needed for regulatory approval. The meeting participants applauded the leading role taken by the WHO in providing a much-needed streamlined approach for development and evaluation of SBPs which will provide efficient and cost-effective product development and increase patient access to treatments. It was recognized that the principles as currently described in the draft WHO guidelines are based on sound science and experience gained over the last fifteen years of biosimilar approvals. However, since these guidelines when finalised will constitute the global standard for biosimilar evaluation and assist national regulatory authorities in establishing revised guidance and regulatory practice in this complex area, it was felt that further revision and clarity on certain perspectives in specific areas was necessary to dispel uncertainties arising in the current revised version. This report describes the principles in the draft guidelines, including topics discussed and consensus reached.

[Influence of sodium alginate on the intestinal transit in low birth weight newborn infants]. / Influence de l'alginate de sodium sur le transit intestinal du nouveau-né de petit poids de naissance.

Sodium alginate (Gaviscon) is used in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux in infants. No digestive disadvantages have as yet been reported with the use of the Gaviscon formula available in France, which contains neither aluminium hydroxide nor thickener. Twenty-two healthy neonates were prospectively studied before and after Gaviscon treatment in order to characterize their whole gut transit time with the use of a carmine index. The head of the marker appeared within the same time in both experiments but the appearance of the tail was earlier in the treated infants (P < 0.05), without any subsequent clinical consequences. The slight increase shown in the rate of the clearance of the marker from the gut, is likely to be related to a less proximal to distal dispersion of the marker, subsequently to physical changes occurring in the viscous alginate. Frequency and consistency of the stools were unmodified by treatment and accordingly Gaviscon can be regarded as having no deleterious effect on transit time in neonates.

Desmopressin has no beneficial effect on excessive postoperative bleeding or blood product requirements associated with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Cardiopulmonary bypass during open-heart surgery is sometimes associated with excessive perioperative bleeding. Following a non-randomized study suggesting that desmopressin acetate (desmopressin) reduced blood product requirements in these patients, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trial of desmopressin (0.3 micrograms/kg, i. v.) in 92 patients with overt bleeding and a prolonged bleeding time. Mean blood loss during the first 24 h post-treatment was similar in the desmopressin and placebo groups (582 vs 465 ml, respectively; p = 0.15). Red-cell (p = 0.76), fresh frozen plasma (r = 0.66) and platelet unit (p = 0.74) requirements were also similar. The haemostatic effect of desmopressin has been attributed to the release of von Willebrand factor (vWF) and a reduced bleeding time. In our study, vWF and factor VIII:C levels increased while the bleeding time decreased significantly at 90 min and 24 h in both groups and, although vWF and factor VIII:C levels were slightly higher in desmopressin-treated patients at 90 min, the difference was not significant. Thrombin-antithrombin III complex, fibrinogen degradation product and tissue plasminogen activator levels, reflecting activation of the coagulation and fibrinolytic systems, respectively, decreased uniformly in both groups. We conclude that desmopressin is not useful in reducing blood loss or blood product requirements in patients with excessive immediate postoperative bleeding.